Re: Update table performance

From: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Update table performance
Date: 2007-08-07 16:03:49
Message-ID: 200708070903.50096@hal.medialogik.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Tuesday 07 August 2007 05:58, Mark Makarowsky
<bedrockconstruction(at)yahoo(dot)com> wrote:
> I have a table with 4,889,820 records in it. The
> table also has 47 fields. I'm having problems with
> update performance. Just as a test, I issued the
> following update:
>
> update valley set test='this is a test'
>
> This took 905641 ms. Isn't that kind of slow?

PostgreSQL has to write a full new version of every row that gets updated.
Updates are, therefore, relatively slow.

I'm guessing you're doing this on a single SATA drive, too, which probably
doesn't help.

--
"If a nation values anything more than freedom, it will lose its freedom;
and the irony of it is that if it is comfort or money that it values more,
it will lose that too." -- Somerset Maugham, Author

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Decibel! 2007-08-07 17:59:14 Re: Update table performance
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2007-08-07 14:53:31 Re: Update table performance