Re: file-system snapshot under freebsd for backup

From: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: ProAce <proace(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Naz Gassiep <naz(at)mira(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: file-system snapshot under freebsd for backup
Date: 2007-08-04 17:56:24
Message-ID: 20070804175624.GT25704@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 09:49:42PM +0800, ProAce wrote:
> The size of my db is more then 50GB , so I consider that the pg_dump
> is not a good backup tool for me.
> And, sometimes, I need query data which is some days ago ( between 1 ~
> 14 days ).
>
> If I want to transfer my db to different PG version, I will use slony-I. :)
>
> I worried that mksnap_ffs spend much time on making a new snapshot.
> I don't know whether PG work very well during the period of making snapshot.
> Or the snapshot be made successfully when the PG execute / commit sql
> statments continuously.

If you're worried then just use PITR with a more conventional copy
mechanism. You don't have to use snapshots.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2007-08-04 18:18:56 Re: python api to backup/restore data
Previous Message Decibel! 2007-08-04 17:54:01 Re: Triggers: Detecting if a column value is explicitly set in an UPD ATE statement or not... ("IS NULL" not working?)