Re: incrementals with pg-dump

From: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: David Bear <David(dot)Bear(at)asu(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: incrementals with pg-dump
Date: 2007-08-04 00:11:38
Message-ID: 20070804001138.GA25704@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:11:01PM -0700, David Bear wrote:
> I googled a bit for an incremental or differential way to backup
> postgresq. I was hoping there would be switch on pg-dumpall that would
> backup all tupples added since some date. Doesn't look like it exists.
>
> I did find a backup method using the WAL files on the file system at
>
> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/databases/2006/07/13/lamp-data-protection.html?page=last
>
> I also found this:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/backup-online.html
>
> I seem to remember around pg 7.x that file system level backups were
> very bad.
>
> Now, it seems the pg 8.x way is to allow the admin to take advantage
> of file system tools look tar, cpio, dump, etc.
>
> I was wondering if there any other recommendations beyond what is
> mentioned in the docs above?

No... if you want incremental backups, use PITR. Someone's done some
work on an incremental version of pg_dump, but I haven't heard anything
about it in about a year.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Decibel! 2007-08-04 00:17:17 Re: Wal standbies switchover
Previous Message Donald Fraser 2007-08-03 23:00:52 WAL segment question