Re: pgpool2 vs sequoia

On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 09:25:41AM +0200, mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 2. August 2007 22:37 schrieben Sie:
> > On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 11:58:40AM +0200, mljv(at)planwerk6(dot)de wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > i would like to use a statement replication for postgresql
> >
> > Why?
>
> i have read
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.2/interactive/high-availability.html
>
> i want 4 synchronous databases with load balancing, so my
> application has high performance and high availability.

Very few people actually need synchronous replication, and those who
do buy Oracle's RAC (and curse it) or use DB2's offering (and also
curse it ;). For most purposes, fast asynchronous replication is good
enough.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to PostgreSQL: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate