From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
Cc: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: default_text_search_config and expression indexes |
Date: | 2007-08-01 21:42:53 |
Message-ID: | 200708012142.l71LgrP04515@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Ron Mayer wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> >> What is a basis of your assumption ? In my opinion, it's very limited
> >> use of text search, because it doesn't supports ranking. For 4-5 years
> >> of tsearch2 usage I never used it and I never seem in mailing lists.
> >> This is very user-oriented feature and we could probably ask
> >> -general people for their opinion.
>
> I think I asked about this kind of usage a couple years back;
> and Oleg pointed out other reasons why it wasn't as good an
> idea too.
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-10/msg00475.php
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-10/msg00477.php
>
> The particular question I had asked why the functional index was
> slower than maintaining the extra column; with the explanation
> that the lossy index having to call the function (including
> parsing, dictionary lookup, etc) for re-checking the data made
> it inadvisable to avoid the extra column anyway.
>
> > I doubt 'general' is going to understand the details of merging this
> > into the backend. I assume we have enough people on hackers to decide
> > this.
> >
> > Are you saying the majority of users have a separate column with a
> > trigger?
>
> I think so. At least when I was using it in 2005 the second
> column with the trigger was faster than using a functional index.
OK, it is good you measured it. I wonder how GIN would behave because
it is not lossy.
> >> We need more feedback from users.
> >
> > Well, I am waiting for other hackers to get involved, but if they don't,
> > I have to evaluate it myself on the email lists.
>
> Personally, I think documentation changes would be an OK way to
> to handle it. Something that makes it extremely clear to the
> user the advantages of having the extra column and the risks
> of avoiding them.
Sure, but you have make sure you use the right configuration in the
trigger, no? Does the tsquery have to use the same configuration?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2007-08-01 22:01:36 | Re: default_text_search_config and expression indexes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-08-01 21:33:52 | Re: default_text_search_config and expression indexes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Mayer | 2007-08-01 22:01:36 | Re: default_text_search_config and expression indexes |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-08-01 21:33:52 | Re: default_text_search_config and expression indexes |