| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Machine available for community use |
| Date: | 2007-07-25 18:11:04 |
| Message-ID: | 200707251911040000@2613631041 |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
> Sent: 25/07/07, 18:54:50
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Machine available for community use
>
> Another fairly big issue is that we need to know whether measurements we
> take in August are comparable to measurements we take in October, so a
> fairly stable platform is important. As you say, a fast-changing kernel
> would make it difficult to have any confidence about comparability over
> time. That would tend to make me vote for RHEL/Centos, where long-term
> stability is an explicit development goal. Debian stable might do too,
> though I'm not as clear about their update criteria as I am about Red Hat's.
Perhaps RH could donate us a RHEL/RHN licence for this?
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin M. Roy | 2007-07-25 18:31:01 | Re: Machine available for community use |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-07-25 18:04:35 | Re: Machine available for community use |