Re: [pgsql-advocacy] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers

From: Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] 8.2 -> 8.3 performance numbers
Date: 2007-07-25 13:07:23
Message-ID: 200707251507.23951.mweilguni@sime.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-performance

Am Mittwoch 25 Juli 2007 schrieb Simon Riggs:
> I have reasonable evidence that Referential Integrity is the major
> performance bottleneck and would like some objective evidence that this
> is the case.

Just curious, will 8.3 still check FK constraints (and use locks) even if the
referencing column value does not change?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2007-07-25 13:41:14 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight
Previous Message Greg Smith 2007-07-25 12:58:31 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers 2007-07-25 13:35:12 Re: index over timestamp not being used
Previous Message Mario Weilguni 2007-07-25 13:05:10 Re: index over timestamp not being used