From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why is lc_messages superuser only? |
Date: | 2007-07-23 15:22:07 |
Message-ID: | 20070723152207.GD5663@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 11:20:15AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> > Is there a reason for this?
>
> Two arguments I can recall:
>
> (1) Having log messages emitted in a language that the DBA can't read
> would be a useful tactic for a Bad Guy trying to cover his tracks.
>
> (2) Setting lc_messages to a value incompatible with the database
> encoding would be likely to result in PANIC or worse.
>
> If we had more-robust locale support, I could see separating lc_messages
> into one setting for messages bound to the client and one for messages
> bound to the log, and making the latter superuser only (or, more likely,
> PGC_SIGHUP, because surely you'd want DB-wide consistency). But we
> are nowhere near being able to do that.
Ok. That makes a lot of sense, unfortunately. Hopefully something we can
get sometime in the future, then :-)
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-07-23 15:26:27 | Re: COPYable logs |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-07-23 15:20:57 | Re: Why is lc_messages superuser only? |