Re: Future of krb5 authentication

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Future of krb5 authentication
Date: 2007-07-18 18:31:00
Message-ID: 20070718183100.GZ4887@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Joshua D. Drake (jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com) wrote:
> Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Joshua D. Drake (jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com) wrote:
>>> How many people actually use kerberos... How many people who are using
>>> kerberos are going to be running 7.3. 7.3 is no longer supported so by
>>> postgresql.org so who cares.
>> AOL, MIT, CMU, to name a few... I'm really annoyed at these constant
>> digs at what is really a very large userbase. Perhaps they're not all
>> running 7.3 but the implication that there's a small number of people
>> using Kerberos is just amazingly far off.
>
> *cough* , compared to the number of installations *not* using kerberos it
> is amazing that you would make such a far off correlation.

Oh, yea, and every place that uses Active Directory ..

> Note that we are talking about Kerberos + PostgreSQL, not Kerberose in
> general.

I was referring to your first question, which, in my view, is the more
appropriate one *anyway*. At least if you have a "PostgreSQL is going
to dominate the WORLD!" point of view, as I do. :)

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-07-18 18:39:30 Re: Future of krb5 authentication
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2007-07-18 18:28:34 Re: Future of krb5 authentication