Re: execl() sentinel

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: execl() sentinel
Date: 2007-07-18 14:59:34
Message-ID: 200707181659.36341.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Am Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2007 16:16 schrieb Tom Lane:
> You should *not* have to inform the machine that NULL is a pointer.

For variadic functions, that expectation is invalid, AFAIK.

It might be good to check the actual definition of NULL in this case, however,
before wondering further.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-07-18 15:04:28 Re: docfix - DELETE doesn't affect auto-analyze
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-07-18 14:16:01 Re: execl() sentinel