| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Future of krb5 authentication |
| Date: | 2007-07-18 16:40:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20070718164048.GS4887@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Magnus Hagander (magnus(at)hagander(dot)net) wrote:
> But we're talking two different issues. Deprecating/removing krb5 is a
> different thing from having GSSAPI and SSPI mutually exclusive or not.
To the extent that keeping krb5 around implies a much lower burden on
GSSAPI support under Windows, I disagree... If we need the MIT
headers/libraries around to support krb5 anyway then I don't feel the
fact that you can do SSPI w/o those headers/libraries to be a case for
not supporting GSSAPI on Windows, we need them anyway...
Thanks,
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2007-07-18 16:41:50 | Re: Future of krb5 authentication |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2007-07-18 16:38:59 | Re: Future of krb5 authentication |