Re: WALL on controller without battery?

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WALL on controller without battery?
Date: 2007-07-11 15:36:20
Message-ID: 20070711153620.GP1241@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:48:04AM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> The question is, would I be better off putting WAL on the second, OS,
> controller or in the 8 port controller? Specially since the 2 port will not
> have battery (3ware does not have 2 ports with battery).

Put the WAL where the battery is. Even if it's slower (and I don't
know whether it will be), I assume that having the right data more
slowly is better than maybe not having the data at all, quickly.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The plural of anecdote is not data.
--Roger Brinner

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-07-11 15:39:11 Re: TIMING A QUERY ???
Previous Message Patric de Waha 2007-07-11 15:35:33 Two questions.. shared_buffers and long reader issue