| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Leon Mergen <leon(at)solatis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Unable to get postgres running after long time no vacuum |
| Date: | 2007-07-09 01:10:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20070709011055.GD9539@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> No, it's orthogonal to whether we want a "quit" command. (My opinion is
> not, because what the heck will we do with it in multiuser mode? And
> there is no good way to shoehorn it into just the single-user mode, it'd
> have to be a grammar entry.)
Hmm, I was thinking that we could just add it in its own grammar, but
then I remembered that the separate grammar is for the bootstrap mode,
not standalone :-( Sorry for the noise.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.flickr.com/photos/alvherre/
"Just treat us the way you want to be treated + some extra allowance
for ignorance." (Michael Brusser)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum | 2007-07-09 01:19:18 | Re: Problem with autovacuum and pg_autovacuum |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-09 00:59:40 | Re: [GENERAL] Unable to get postgres running after long time no vacuum |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-09 01:46:41 | Re: PQescapeBytea* version for parameters |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-09 00:59:40 | Re: [GENERAL] Unable to get postgres running after long time no vacuum |