On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 11:11:30PM +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> The question was is there something else that exists in PostgreSQL and
> will do the same job.
Why re-invent the wheel, and make it square? But also, if you don't
care whether you keep your data, why on earth are you putting it in
an RDBMS? Is it because all your pre-built tools already speak SQL?
If you're really after performance, I'm not convinced a SQL-speaking
RDBMS (delivered by MySQL or Postgres or anyone else) is what you
actually need.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness.
--George Orwell