| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Still recommending daily vacuum... |
| Date: | 2007-07-03 20:13:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20070703201340.GV85497@nasby.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:19:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/routine-vacuuming.html :
>
> Well, with autovac defaulting to ON in 8.3, that's certainly obsolete
> text now.
>
> Is there a reason to say anything beyond "use autovac"?
There is; I know that things like web session tables aren't handled very
well by autovacuum if there are any moderately large tables (anything
that will take more than a few minutes to vacuum). Eventually we should
be able to accommodate that case with multiple workers, but we'll need a
mechanism to ensure that at least one worker doesn't get tied up in
large vacuums.
--
Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-03 20:36:23 | Re: Still recommending daily vacuum... |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2007-07-03 20:09:41 | Re: Still recommending daily vacuum... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-07-03 20:36:23 | Re: Still recommending daily vacuum... |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2007-07-03 20:09:41 | Re: Still recommending daily vacuum... |