Re: Still recommending daily vacuum...

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Still recommending daily vacuum...
Date: 2007-07-03 20:13:40
Message-ID: 20070703201340.GV85497@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:19:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jim C. Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/routine-vacuuming.html :
>
> Well, with autovac defaulting to ON in 8.3, that's certainly obsolete
> text now.
>
> Is there a reason to say anything beyond "use autovac"?

There is; I know that things like web session tables aren't handled very
well by autovacuum if there are any moderately large tables (anything
that will take more than a few minutes to vacuum). Eventually we should
be able to accommodate that case with multiple workers, but we'll need a
mechanism to ensure that at least one worker doesn't get tied up in
large vacuums.
--
Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-07-03 20:36:23 Re: Still recommending daily vacuum...
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2007-07-03 20:09:41 Re: Still recommending daily vacuum...

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-07-03 20:36:23 Re: Still recommending daily vacuum...
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2007-07-03 20:09:41 Re: Still recommending daily vacuum...