From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce McAlister <bruce(dot)mcalister(at)blueface(dot)ie> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: AutoVacuum Behaviour Question |
Date: | 2007-06-27 01:53:02 |
Message-ID: | 20070627015302.GO11609@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Bruce McAlister wrote:
> I have just checked the pg_stat_all_tables in the pg_catalog schema and
> I can see the index scans etc table values incrementing. The data in the
> tables seems to be updating. Just an FYI, I've enabled manual vacuum
> analyze runs on the blueface-service database up until we've found whats
> going wrong here. The output from the select query you suggested is as
> follows:
>
> datname | datconfig
> -------------------------+-----------
> postgres |
> blueface-webmail |
[etc]
Ok so it's not that you manually disabled autovacuum. And pgstat is
working on those databases. And all databases share the postgresql.conf
autovacuum configuration.
> I enabled the log_line_prefix option and put in a %p in the value, and I
> only get the following output from the logs:
>
> Jun 26 23:46:07 bfiedb01 postgres[2836]: [ID 748848 local0.debug] [5-1]
> 2836 DEBUG: autovacuum: processing database "blueface-crm"
> Jun 26 23:47:32 bfiedb01 postgres[2863]: [ID 748848 local0.debug] [5-1]
> 2863 DEBUG: autovacuum: processing database "blueface-crm"
I assume that there is no other line for process 2836 before the line
for process 2863. Can you recheck that?
What does
select datname, age(datfrozenxid) from pg_database;
show?
> I've also just run a manual 'VACUUM ANALYZE FULL VERBOSE;' just to
> ensure it goes through manually.
And it does finish successfully?
> What does the DEBUG1 output of a normal autovacuum run look like in the
> log file?
Nothing interesting shows up:
LOG: autovacuum: processing database "test1"
LOG: autovacuum: processing database "test2"
If you try with debug2, it looks a bit more interesting:
LOG: autovacuum: processing database "test2"
DEBUG: autovac: will VACUUM foo
DEBUG: vacuuming "public.foo"
DEBUG: "foo": removed 10000 row versions in 55 pages
DETAIL: CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec.
DEBUG: "foo": found 10000 removable, 0 nonremovable row versions in 55 pages
DETAIL: 0 dead row versions cannot be removed yet.
There were 0 unused item pointers.
0 pages are entirely empty.
CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec.
DEBUG: "foo": truncated 55 to 0 pages
DETAIL: CPU 0.00s/0.00u sec elapsed 0.00 sec.
The only thing I can think of right now is that pgstats does not have
entries for the other databases for some reason. How can that happen
escapes me.
--
Alvaro Herrera Developer, http://www.PostgreSQL.org/
"Doing what he did amounts to sticking his fingers under the hood of the
implementation; if he gets his fingers burnt, it's his problem." (Tom Lane)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vivek Khera | 2007-06-27 03:06:07 | Re: growing disk usage problem: alternative solution? |
Previous Message | Bruce McAlister | 2007-06-26 23:01:06 | Re: AutoVacuum Behaviour Question |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-06-27 01:59:14 | Re: Bugtraq: Having Fun With PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Bruce McAlister | 2007-06-26 23:01:06 | Re: AutoVacuum Behaviour Question |