Re: To all the pgsql developers..Have a look at the operators proposed by me in my researc

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tasneem Memon <tasneememon(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: To all the pgsql developers..Have a look at the operators proposed by me in my researc
Date: 2007-06-16 19:16:12
Message-ID: 200706161216.12546.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tasneem,

> For example: For 6,
> the range defined by NEAR is: 4 – 8 For
> 2147,483,647, the range defined by NEAR is: 1717,986,917 –
> 2576,980,377 But yes, for other cases it may not give good results. We can
> give the option for the user to specify the membership degree, or one can
> always use the BETWEEN operator when he knows the thresholds exactly.

Oh, so this is actually based on a direct calculation on the values, rather
than on the population of data. That's much easier; heck, you could index on
it.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-06-16 19:17:03 Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints test results
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-06-16 17:29:57 Re: How does the tsearch configuration get selected?