From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>, Liam O'Duibhir <liamod(at)fast(dot)fujitsu(dot)com(dot)au> |
Subject: | Re: The Business Case for PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2007-06-15 15:27:09 |
Message-ID: | 200706151127.10278.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Friday 15 June 2007 05:28, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Liam O'Duibhir wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I have posted to Advocacy before about the Business Case for PostgreSQL
> > initiative.
> >
> > I am pleased to announce that a full-colour A4 and US print-format PDF
> > copy of the "Business Case for PostgreSQL" document is now available
> > from the Fujitsu Supported PostgreSQL (FSP) website:
> >
> > http://postgresql.fastware.com/community/business_case_for_postgresql
>
> Very nice .. one area where I was not sure if the message comes across
> just right is under the title "Stop paying for software modules you
> don't need". I think this could be interpreted as an excuse for lack of
> features.
>
> Maybe things like contrib should be mentioned here or the fact that
> there are multiple different bundles that are based on PostgreSQL that
> tailor to specific types of users?
>
Or turn it on it's head... You wont have to pay extra to gain access to
advanced functionality, and the cost of software wont increase even if your
needs for features does.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-06-15 15:31:56 | Re: How does the tsearch configuration get selected? |
Previous Message | Teodor Sigaev | 2007-06-15 15:16:10 | Re: How does the tsearch configuration get selected? |