| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately |
| Date: | 2007-06-13 18:49:11 |
| Message-ID: | 20070613184911.GD11499@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Ah; yes, what I was proposing (or thought about proposing, not sure if I
> > posted it or not) was putting a upper limit of 10 seconds in the sleep
> > (bgwriter sleeps 10 seconds if configured to not do anything). Though
> > 10 seconds may seem like an eternity for systems like the ones Peter was
> > talking about, where there is a script trying to restart the server as
> > soon as the postmaster dies.
Peter, is 10 seconds good enough for you?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-06-13 19:33:15 | Re: EXPLAIN omits schema? |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-06-13 18:44:09 | Re: [HACKERS] Avoiding legal email signatures |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-06-13 21:01:24 | Re: pipe chunks protocol |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2007-06-13 18:05:23 | Re: Controlling Load Distributed Checkpoints |