Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Hammond <andrew(dot)george(dot)hammond(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately
Date: 2007-06-08 23:19:40
Message-ID: 20070608231940.GE23222@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Matthew T. O'Connor escribió:

> Ok, but I think the question posed is that in say a virtual hosting
> environment there might be say 1,000 databases in the cluster. Am I
> still going to have to wait a long time for my database to get vacuumed?
> I don't think this has changed much no?

Depends on how much time it takes to vacuum the other 999 databases.
The default max workers is 3.

> (If default naptime is 1 minute, then autovacuum won't even look at a
> given database but once every 1,000 minutes (16.67 hours) assuming that
> there isn't enough work to keep all the workers busy.)

The naptime is per database. Which means if you have 1000 databases and
a naptime of 60 seconds, the launcher is going to wake up every 100
milliseconds to check things up. (This results from 60000 / 1000 = 60
ms, but there is a minimum of 100 ms just to keep things sane).

If there are 3 workers and each of the 1000 databases in average takes
10 seconds to vacuum, there will be around 3000 seconds between autovac
runs of your database assuming my math is right.

I hope those 1000 databases you put in your shared hosting are not very
big.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2007-06-09 00:36:55 Re: Using the GPU
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-06-08 23:12:42 Re: Patch review process; Warning to patch submitters

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jon Colverson 2007-06-08 23:28:18 Re: Patch for recent PITR bug
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2007-06-08 22:40:59 Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately