| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postmaster processes taking all the CPU |
| Date: | 2007-06-08 22:13:02 |
| Message-ID: | 20070608221302.GC19130@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:08:26PM -0500, MC Moisei wrote:
> Yes all the connection are coming from within the box so no network
> latency.Well, isn't the swap can be because too many process
> postmaster are requiring more memory.
But why are they requring more memory? Do you maybe have (e.g.)
work_mem set too high, and that's what is causing your problem? Or
shared buffers too big? This is a common error, and on a smaller set
of data, it won't hurt; but when the data gets to a point, you lose.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
A certain description of men are for getting out of debt, yet are
against all taxes for raising money to pay it off.
--Alexander Hamilton
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erwin Brandstetter | 2007-06-08 22:15:08 | Re: how to speed up query |
| Previous Message | MC Moisei | 2007-06-08 22:08:26 | Re: Postmaster processes taking all the CPU |