From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Marc Cousin <mcousin(at)sigma(dot)fr> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: about threaded libpq |
Date: | 2007-06-06 03:51:31 |
Message-ID: | 200706060351.l563pV628487@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Marc Cousin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently working with bacula developpers in order to improve performance
> (mainly for postgresql).
>
> In order for our new code to work, we need to be sure that libpq is threaded.
> For 8.2, we can use PQisthreadsafe();. The problem is we cannot force all
> users to migrate to 8.2, and that many of them use packaged postgresql
> binaries.
>
> Is there another reliable way to determine (at bacula configure time for
> instance) that libpq is threaded ? (it also has to be a way/several ways that
> works on all platforms, as bacula runs on many unix and win32). We'd like to
> do it as well as possible.
Uh, you can look at the 'pg_config --configure' output.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brad Nicholson | 2007-06-06 13:57:44 | Re: the right time to vacuum database? |
Previous Message | Charles.Hou | 2007-06-06 00:28:10 | Re: the right time to vacuum database? |