Re: Encrypted column

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Encrypted column
Date: 2007-06-05 15:27:26
Message-ID: 20070605152726.GU4818@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-sql

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:28:00AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> If he is a CC customer, the system (which I am DBA of) bills his
> card directly, saving the customer much time and effort.

So surely what you have is a completely separate system that has
exactly one interface to it, that is signaled to provide a
transaction number and that only ever returns such a transaction
number to the "online" system, and that is very tightly secured,
right?

It is possible to make trade-offs in an intelligent manner, for sure,
but you sure as heck don't want that kind of data stored online with
simple reversible encryption.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness.
--George Orwell

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-06-05 15:29:54 Re: lo or bytea streaming engine??
Previous Message Brian Mathis 2007-06-05 15:22:04 Re: Encrypted column

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Atkins 2007-06-05 15:39:32 Re: Encrypted column
Previous Message Brian Mathis 2007-06-05 15:22:04 Re: Encrypted column