From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Encrypted column |
Date: | 2007-06-05 15:27:26 |
Message-ID: | 20070605152726.GU4818@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-sql |
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:28:00AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> If he is a CC customer, the system (which I am DBA of) bills his
> card directly, saving the customer much time and effort.
So surely what you have is a completely separate system that has
exactly one interface to it, that is signaled to provide a
transaction number and that only ever returns such a transaction
number to the "online" system, and that is very tightly secured,
right?
It is possible to make trade-offs in an intelligent manner, for sure,
but you sure as heck don't want that kind of data stored online with
simple reversible encryption.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The whole tendency of modern prose is away from concreteness.
--George Orwell
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-06-05 15:29:54 | Re: lo or bytea streaming engine?? |
Previous Message | Brian Mathis | 2007-06-05 15:22:04 | Re: Encrypted column |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2007-06-05 15:39:32 | Re: Encrypted column |
Previous Message | Brian Mathis | 2007-06-05 15:22:04 | Re: Encrypted column |