Re: upgraded to pgsql 8.2.4, getting worse performance then 7.4.x

From: Douglas J Hunley <doug(at)hunley(dot)homeip(dot)net>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: upgraded to pgsql 8.2.4, getting worse performance then 7.4.x
Date: 2007-06-05 14:34:04
Message-ID: 200706051034.04087.doug@hunley.homeip.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Monday 04 June 2007 17:11:23 Gregory Stark wrote:
> Those plans look like they have a lot of casts to text in them. How have
> you defined your indexes? Are your id columns really text?

project table:
Indexes:
"project_pk" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
"project_path" UNIQUE, btree (path)

role table:
Indexes:
"role_pk" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)

role_default_user table:
Indexes:
"role_def_user_pk" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
"role_def_u_prj_idx" UNIQUE, btree (role_id, default_user_class_id,
project_id)

role_operation table:
Indexes:
"role_operation_pk" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
"role_oper_obj_oper" btree (object_type_id, operation_category,
operation_name)
"role_oper_role_id" btree (role_id)

sfuser table:
Indexes:
"sfuser_pk" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
"sfuser_username" UNIQUE, btree (username)

projectmembership table:
Indexes:
"pjmb_pk" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
"pjmb_projmember" UNIQUE, btree (project_id, member_id)
"pjmb_member" btree (member_id)

relationship table:
Indexes:
"relationship_pk" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
"relation_origin" btree (origin_id)
"relation_target" btree (target_id)
"relation_type" btree (relationship_type_name)

field_value table:
Indexes:
"field_value_pk" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
"f_val_fid_val_idx" UNIQUE, btree (field_id, value)
"field_class_idx" btree (value_class)
"field_value_idx" btree (value)

item table:
Indexes:
"item_pk" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
"item_created_by_id" btree (created_by_id)
"item_folder" btree (folder_id)
"item_name" btree (name)

and yes, the 'id' column is always: character varying type

> And you don't have a 7.4 install around to compare the plans do you?

I have a 7.3.19 db, if that would be useful

--
Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778
http://doug.hunley.homeip.net

Whose cruel idea was it for the word "lisp" to have an "s" in it?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2007-06-05 14:42:36 Re: dbt2 NOTPM numbers
Previous Message Markus Schiltknecht 2007-06-05 14:25:33 Re: dbt2 NOTPM numbers