Re: [Fwd: Re: Autovacuum keeps vacuuming a table disabled in pg_autovacuum]

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Autovacuum keeps vacuuming a table disabled in pg_autovacuum]
Date: 2007-06-04 15:10:49
Message-ID: 20070604151049.GR32320@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:34:13AM -0700, Ron St-Pierre wrote:
> >VACUUM FULL _does not_ mean "vacuum everything"!

> What do you mean by this?

Sorry, I was trying to prevent you doing a VACUUM FULL you didn't
want (but another message said you actually intended a vacuum full).
Several people have been bitten by the misunderstanding that "VACUUM
FULL" means "VACUUM ALL TABLES" (e.g. vaccum full database).

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rhys Stewart 2007-06-04 15:15:50 Re: what to do when pg_cancel_backend() doesnt work?
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-06-04 15:07:12 Re: NULLS and User Input WAS Re: multimaster