Re: So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg right now?

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg right now?
Date: 2007-06-04 14:50:17
Message-ID: 20070604145017.GA31457@feivel.credativ.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:30:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAICS, Peter's recent incomplete updating of error message wording
> should have broken every last man jack of 'em. And yet there's still
> some green to be seen. I think we are looking at problems in the ecpg
> test scaffolding. For instance, dragonfly claims a green build, but
> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=dragonfly&dt=2007-06-04%20043001&stg=ecpg-check
> shows this interesting trace:
> ...
> testing connect/test2.pgc ... ./pg_regress: bad substitution

Is it possible to find out which line is reporting this error? Looks to
me like some incompatibility on the shell side.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-06-04 15:04:26 Re: Autovacuum launcher doesn't notice death of postmaster immediately
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-06-04 14:43:27 Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts