Re: multimaster

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: multimaster
Date: 2007-06-01 19:44:31
Message-ID: 20070601194431.GO24299@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 11:50:09AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> What you are basically saying below is... web 2.0 developers such as
> rails developers have so fundamentally broken the way it is supposed to
> be done, we should too...

I don't know that's all there is to it. After all, we support arrays
in the database, which ought to make any relational purist shudder.
It seems to me that there _are_ legitimate limits to single-back-end
approaches, even for well designed systems, and being able to spread
some of that load around would be a big advantage. I just don't want
to do it without thinking hard about what the compromises might be,
and figuring out which ones to make. "Breaks transactional model",
for instance, is right out :)

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-06-01 19:50:55 Re: Slightly OT.
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-06-01 19:42:22 Re: multimaster (was: Slightly OT.)