From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating anupdatable view) |
Date: | 2007-06-01 18:40:55 |
Message-ID: | 200706011840.l51Iet502993@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm sorry guys but I don't agree this is a TODO item.
> ...
> > Also, methinks we should have agreed behaviour before we make something
> > a TODO item.
>
> There is a whole *lot* of stuff in the TODO list that does not have a
> consensus solution yet. You should not imagine that it's gospel.
>
> At the same time, it'd be better if this item were worded more like
> "investigate this issue" rather than presupposing a particular
> form of answer.
OK, new wording:
o Research self-referential UPDATEs that see inconsistent row versions
in read-committed mode
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-05/msg00507.php
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-06-01 18:53:54 | Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updatinganupdatable view) |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-06-01 18:23:38 | Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts |