Re: Padding on 64-bit

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I think that's backwards. We *are* passing them by reference, we should
> be considering passing them by value.

Thanks, fixed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> //Magnus
>
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Added to TODO:
> >
> > * Consider allowing 64-bit integers to be passed by reference on 64-bit
> > platforms
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Neil Conway wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2007-29-05 at 16:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> (I imagine someday we'll get around to allowing int8 to be pass-by-value
> >>> on 64-bit platforms.)
> >> This could really be a significant performance win: I'm planning to take
> >> a look at doing it for 8.4.
> >>
> >> -Neil
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >> TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> >> choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> >> match
> >

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +