| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Vacuum takes forever |
| Date: | 2007-05-30 14:11:04 |
| Message-ID: | 20070530141104.GE16260@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 07:56:07PM +0200, Joost Kraaijeveld wrote:
> Thanks, I tried it and it worked. I did not know that changing this
> setting would result in such a performance drop ( I just followed an
It's not a performance drop. It's an on-purpose delay of the
functionality, introduced so that _other_ transactions don't get I/O
starved. ("Make vacuum fast" isn't in most cases an interesting
goal.)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now.
--J.D. Baldwin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Stone | 2007-05-30 14:25:59 | Re: setting up raid10 with more than 4 drives |
| Previous Message | Luke Lonergan | 2007-05-30 14:09:02 | Re: Bad RAID1 read performance |