From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What is the maximum encoding-conversion growth rate, anyway? |
Date: | 2007-05-29 02:49:00 |
Message-ID: | 20070529.114900.23027278.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Can we add a column to pg_conversion which represents the "growth
> > rate"? This would reduce the rate for most encodings much smaller than
> > 6.
>
> We need to do something, but the pg_conversion catalog seems a bad place
> to put the info --- don't we have places that need to be able to do
> conversion without catalog access?
Can you tell me where? I thought conversion functions are always
called by using OidFunctionCall5 thus we need to consult the
pg_conversion catalog beforehand anyway.
> Perhaps better would be to redefine the API for the conversion functions
> so that they palloc their own result space. Then each conversion
> function would have to know the maximum growth rate for its particular
> conversion. This change would also make it feasible for a conversion
> function to prescan the data and determine an exact output size, if that
> seemed worthwhile because the potential growth rate was too extreme.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2007-05-29 02:55:33 | Re: Fixing insecure security definer functions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-29 02:45:28 | Re: Fixing insecure security definer functions |