| From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Need software infrastructure advice |
| Date: | 2007-05-23 19:59:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20070523195944.GD27056@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 01:51:28PM -0500, Aaron Zeitler wrote:
> Internet went down for a few minutes (or days). The main problem with this
> solution is that Slony-1 says that you really shouldn't have more than a
> dozen places that you replicate to, and I have 60. I would also like to be
> able to go well beyond 60 (so I am looking for a scalable solution). Also,
> sometimes the Internet connection to a location goes down. Some are more
> "flakey" than others. Slony-1 says it is not for this type of situation.
This is a bit of a kludge -- ok, a _lot_ of a kludge -- but you
could probably do this with Slony using the log shipping features
instead. That would solve your "60 locations" issue, I think.
Alternatively, you might be able to do this by sort of summarizing in
a few locations, so that you do have 60 nodes, but not all nodes have
to talk to all other nodes. (I think the flakey network might bite
you here, though.)
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
If they don't do anything, we don't need their acronym.
--Josh Hamilton, on the US FEMA
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Danilo Freitas da Costa | 2007-05-23 20:31:21 | Database Security |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-05-23 19:50:06 | Re: Performance |