Re: 500 requests per second

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tarhon-Onu Victor <mituc(at)iasi(dot)rdsnet(dot)ro>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 500 requests per second
Date: 2007-05-21 20:46:55
Message-ID: 20070521204655.GL62346@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 03:50:27PM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> I work on a system about like you describe....400tps constant....24/7.
> Major challenges are routine maintenance and locking. Autovacuum is
> your friend but you will need to schedule a full vaccum once in a
> while because of tps wraparound. If you allow AV to do this, none of
> your other tables get vacuumed until it completes....heh!

BTW, that's changed in either 8.2 or 8.3; the change is that freeze
information is now tracked on a per-table basis instead of per-database.
So autovacuum isn't forced into freezing everything in the database at
once.
--
Jim Nasby decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PFC 2007-05-21 20:48:04 Re: 500 requests per second
Previous Message Y Sidhu 2007-05-21 20:19:02 Re: pg_stats how-to?