Re: Concurrent psql patch

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Jim Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Concurrent psql patch
Date: 2007-05-21 14:21:33
Message-ID: 200705211621.34078.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Am Montag, 21. Mai 2007 15:21 schrieb Gregory Stark:
> Also, I forgot to mention previously there is an unrelated trivial hunk in
> here. I noticed we free the password early, presumably for security
> reasons,

No, to save memory.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2007-05-21 14:59:28 Re: [Fwd: PGBuildfarm member vaquita Branch HEAD Status changed from ECPG-Check failure to OK]
Previous Message Shachar Shemesh 2007-05-21 14:02:49 Re: Re: [Oledb-dev] double precision error with pg linux server, but not with windows pg server

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2007-05-21 14:58:29 Re: Patch needed fot dt.h
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-05-21 14:17:30 Re: Patch needed fot dt.h