From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: FK plans cached? Known bug? |
Date: | 2007-05-18 17:52:01 |
Message-ID: | 20070518175201.GB15691@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > (This is on 8.2) What is happening here -- are we caching the plan for
> > the FK check query?
>
> Yeah, we've always done so. I'm a bit surprised though that it's
> letting you drop the index --- isn't that index required for the FK
> constraint? Exactly what is the constraint anyway?
create table a (a int primary key);
create table b (a bigint not null references a);
create index b_a on b(a);
insert into a select generate_series(1, 1000000);
insert into b select generate_series(1, 1000000);
delete from a where a = 2;
-- fails, constraint violated
drop index b_a;
delete from a where a = 2;
-- fails, can't open index
The problem I was actually investigating was that pgstats does not seem
to count certain scans of the index on the b table. I haven't been able
to reproduce the bug.
The symptom was that they found that the index had 0 on all counts in
pgstats, so they dropped it; they immediately noticed the load to raise.
This is on 8.1.4; I didn't find any message in the commit logs about
that.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-18 18:08:42 | Re: FK plans cached? Known bug? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-18 17:44:46 | Re: FK plans cached? Known bug? |