From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 8.3 pending patch queue |
Date: | 2007-05-15 22:50:10 |
Message-ID: | 200705152250.l4FMoAU20887@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > If people want proof that we have had some patches for months, this
> > email is from Simon from January, 2007.
> >
>
> I don't think anyone (at least sanely) questions that there are patches
> hanging out there.
My point is that pushing them for 8.4 effectively doesn't move us
forward because we have been "pushing" for a while.
And you can't blame tracking because everyone knows what has to happen.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 19:04 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>
> >>> I will start processing the patches held for 8.3 this week or next, now
> >>> that the holiday break is over:
> >>>
> >>> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
> >>>
> >> The following patches don't appear on this list:
> >>
> >> Concurrent psql
> >> Original submission
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00249.php
> >> Latest
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-12/msg00527.php
> >> Described here: http://community.enterprisedb.com/concurrent/index.html
> >>
> >> WAL Index Split
> >> Original submission
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-12/msg00045.php
> >> Latest
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-01/msg00000.php
> >>
> >> Grouped Items
> >> Latest
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-11/msg00051.php
> >> Described here: http://community.enterprisedb.com/git/index.html
> >>
> >> Maintain Cluster Order
> >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00124.php
> >>
> >> All have been awaiting review for at least a month (though in one case
> >> the latest version is quite recent). They probably ought to be on the
> >> hold queue; all are ready to be reviewed for final
> >> application/rejection.
> >>
> >> I'd hasten to add that none of those are mine. My patches have received
> >> good attention, so I'm not complaining just completing admin.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Simon Riggs
> >> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> >> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >>
> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2007-05-15 22:58:33 | Re: Not ready for 8.3 |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-05-15 22:46:51 | Re: Seq scans roadmap |