From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Martin Marques <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: UTF-8 to ASCII |
Date: | 2007-05-11 19:01:56 |
Message-ID: | 20070511190156.GA30661@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane escribió:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Why on earth is it talking about MULE_INTERNAL?
>
> IIRC, a lot of the conversions translate through some common
> intermediate charset to save on code/table space. In such cases
> the problem will usually be detected on the backend conversion...
Interesting, but it doesn't explain why the conversion doesn't work.
AFAICS the operation I am requesting is valid.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2007-05-11 19:18:21 | Re: Fault Tolerant Postgresql (two machines, two postmasters, one disk array) |
Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2007-05-11 18:56:41 | Re: table change |