From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New idea for patch tracking |
Date: | 2007-05-05 16:40:07 |
Message-ID: | 200705051740070000@698317245 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
> To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: 05/05/07, 11:06:37
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New idea for patch tracking
>
> > <snip tracker outline>
> >
> > Barring a few trivial details, that sounds almost identical to what I
> > proposed.
>
> Well, Andrew says everyone he talks to doesn't want it. They want a
> more comprehensive solution that goes from bug to patch.
>
I don't recall him saying that, though I do know that's /his/ opinion. It's certainly *not* the opinion of most of the people I've spoken with.
I don't disagree with the idea in principle though, but I don't believe it will work for us because it's so fundamentally different from the way we currently work and still wouldn't solve the problem of capturing all the relevant discussion regarding a given patch (or bug) without a reasonable amount of manual work, or grafting a large part of what I'm proposing on the side.
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zdenek Kotala | 2007-05-05 16:42:20 | Re: Integer datetimes |
Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-05-05 16:23:57 | Re: Patch Status in the wiki |