Re: New idea for patch tracking

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New idea for patch tracking
Date: 2007-05-05 16:40:07
Message-ID: 200705051740070000@698317245
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
> To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: 05/05/07, 11:06:37
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New idea for patch tracking
>
> > <snip tracker outline>
> >
> > Barring a few trivial details, that sounds almost identical to what I
> > proposed.
>
> Well, Andrew says everyone he talks to doesn't want it. They want a
> more comprehensive solution that goes from bug to patch.
>

I don't recall him saying that, though I do know that's /his/ opinion. It's certainly *not* the opinion of most of the people I've spoken with.

I don't disagree with the idea in principle though, but I don't believe it will work for us because it's so fundamentally different from the way we currently work and still wouldn't solve the problem of capturing all the relevant discussion regarding a given patch (or bug) without a reasonable amount of manual work, or grafting a large part of what I'm proposing on the side.

Regards, Dave

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2007-05-05 16:42:20 Re: Integer datetimes
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2007-05-05 16:23:57 Re: Patch Status in the wiki