From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New idea for patch tracking |
Date: | 2007-05-05 07:35:27 |
Message-ID: | 200705050835280000@2134815378 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
> To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> Sent: 05/05/07, 03:00:25
> Subject: [HACKERS] New idea for patch tracking
>
> As for #3, again, I don't want us to take on a burdensome patch tracking
> process that is more effort than it is worth, and the lack of people
> jumping to even manage a simple web page for current 8.3 patches has me
> questioning what kind of support a burdensome tracking system would
> receive.
I don't recall hearing you ask for people to help with a web page.
> What I think we can do simply is to have our email software automatically
> number emails submitted to the patches list that already don't have a
> number. This way, all followups, even if moved to the hackers list, would
> maintain that patch number, and if an updated version is posted, the user
> would keep the same number in the email subject.
<snip tracker outline>
Barring a few trivial details, that sounds almost identical to what I proposed.
Regards, Dave
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2007-05-05 08:34:00 | Re: how does one set the plpython python interpreter? |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2007-05-05 07:22:31 | Integer datetimes |