Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Sebastian Hennebrueder <usenet(at)laliluna(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning
Date: 2007-05-04 17:11:42
Message-ID: 200705041011.42313.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-performance

Sebastian,

> Before inventing a hyper tool, we might consider to provide 3-5 example
> szenarios for common hardware configurations. This consumes less time
> and be discussed and defined in a couple of days. This is of course not
> the correct option for a brandnew 20 spindle Sata 10.000 Raid 10 system
> but these are probably not the target for default configurations.

That's been suggested a number of times, but some GUCs are really tied to the
*exact* amount of RAM you have available. So I've never seen how "example
configurations" could help.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Maier 2007-05-04 17:12:09 Re: multi-language web application: is it possible?
Previous Message shawn 2007-05-04 16:54:09 DataArchitect Version 4.0 now available

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sebastian Hennebrueder 2007-05-04 17:22:31 Re: Feature Request --- was: PostgreSQL Performance Tuning
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2007-05-04 17:10:16 Re: Query performance problems with partitioned tables