| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: strange buildfarm failures |
| Date: | 2007-05-02 14:06:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20070502140605.GK4585@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > I agree that that would be a bug and we should fix it, but I don't think
> > it explains the problem we're seeing because there is no PG_TRY block
> > in the autovac startup code that I can see :-(
>
> I'm wondering if there is some code path that invokes a PG_TRY deep in
> the bowels of the system.
Well, I checked all the bowels involved in autovacuum startup.
> Anyway, I'll go fix this, and we should know soon enough if it changes
> the buildfarm behavior.
Agreed.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2007-05-02 14:09:37 | Re: Patch queue triage |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-05-02 13:55:43 | Re: strange buildfarm failures |