Re: Modifying TOAST thresholds

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Modifying TOAST thresholds
Date: 2007-04-27 00:37:49
Message-ID: 200704270037.l3R0bnx13336@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


I have seen no one do peroformance testing of this, so it seems it will
have to wait for 8.4.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
> > What I would definitely like to see for 8.3 is some performance testing
> > done to determine whether we ought to change the current defaults.
> > (Both TOAST_TUPLES_PER_PAGE and EXTERN_TUPLES_PER_PAGE ought to be looked
> > at.)
>
> It will take some thinking before it's even clear what we should be measuring.
> The "optimal" value will depend heavily on the usage pattern so the best value
> for the default will be something hand-wavy like "the smallest tuple size
> where the cost of a select including the column is greater than the time saved
> on a select not including the column" or something like that.
>
> --
> Gregory Stark
> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Koichi Suzuki 2007-04-27 00:50:13 Re: [HACKERS] Full page writes improvement, code update
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-04-27 00:34:23 Re: elog(FATAL) vs shared memory