From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, josh(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-slavestothewww] New News Entry (id: 791) |
Date: | 2007-04-23 16:44:07 |
Message-ID: | 20070423164407.GC12624@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 05:59:31AM +0000, World Wide Web Owner wrote:
> >>> A new entry has been added to the news database.
> >>>
> >>> ----
> >>> Submitted by: josh(at)postgresql(dot)org
> >>> Headline: Security Update Releases
> >>> Summary:
> >>>
> >>> The PGDG has released a new minor version which fixes a privilege escalation exploit, as well as assorted minor issues.
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >> How come we're not even listing the version numbers of our upgrades in the
> >> news item?! A reason for it, or overlook?
> >
> > Josh didn't have all releases mentioned in the original, so I didn't
> > add it. What I did do, though, was to add the release numbers to the
> > email subject line.
>
> I think it's important to include it, because a lot of people have no
> idea what we're talking about if we just say "back branches" or
> something like that. And I do believe it should go in the contents to be
> completely clear.
FWIW I tried to add the version numbers to the techdocs page but it said
it was being edited for so long that I gave up.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-04-23 17:01:33 | Re: [pgsql-slavestothewww] New News Entry (id: 791) |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-04-23 16:42:33 | Re: [pgsql-slavestothewww] New News Entry (id: 791) |