From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Dany DeBontridder <dany118(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: where to write small reusable functions ? |
Date: | 2007-04-17 21:28:58 |
Message-ID: | 20070417212858.GC72669@nasby.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:02:28PM +0200, Dany DeBontridder wrote:
> On 4/13/07, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >Dany DeBontridder wrote:
> >> I'm working to implement a new feature to pg_dump: the ability to dump
> >> objects like function, indexes...
> >
> >pg_dump already dumps functions and indexes.
>
> Right but you can't dump only one or two functions or only the functions and
> nothing else. (the same for index, triggers...)
You should make sure and read past discussion about this, as well as
propose a design to the community before getting too far into a patch.
--
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-17 22:01:15 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Also done for PL/pgSQL: < o Add support for WITH HOLD and |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-04-17 21:24:30 | Re: Can't ri_KeysEqual() consider two nulls as equal? |