From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Vista/IPv6 |
Date: | 2007-04-12 10:11:18 |
Message-ID: | 20070412101118.GG16892@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:58:26AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2007 09:04 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> > The point is still what happens when you distribute a binary built on a
> > system with ipv6 to a system that doesn't have it.
>
> I think the problem is that you appear to have an ambiguous and overly coarse
> definition of a "system with ipv6".
Possibly :-) I just want to make sure it doesn't break for our end users,
no matter what the definition is.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-04-12 10:14:43 | Re: Vista/IPv6 |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD | 2007-04-12 09:49:21 | Re: Eliminating unnecessary left joins |