| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists |
| Date: | 2007-04-11 05:57:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20070411055750.6E262DCC7BC@svr2.hagander.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> I thought we had things set up so that there were multiple people
> moderating the postgres mail lists, but it seems like the average time
> to approve postings from unsubscribed folk has slid back down to the
> two-or-three-day range :-(. What can be done to improve that? Maybe
> recruit a few more moderators?
I also think we have different sets of moderators for different lists, because some seen to have better response times. But I could be mistaken on that since
I've made no actual check on that ;) I've asked for a list of who moderates what to be documented somewhere, but nothing yet. That would be a good starting
point to see if we need more moderators.
I've also had a commit message moderated because it contained the c word that is in c-handler. Apart from having that approved, I think that specific check is
stupid and should be removed. If possible, all checks on commit messages should be excluded.
/Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-11 06:15:26 | Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists |
| Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2007-04-11 05:38:15 | Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists |