| From: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Arrays of Complex Types |
| Date: | 2007-04-09 21:12:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20070409211224.GD30972@svana.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:07:16PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Some type systems have named array types, some don't. I can live happily
> with either. Are array types anonymous in the standard?
Yes, they're anonymous in the standard. That doesn't mean we can't give
them names if we wanted...
> At any rate, the point of the remark was to take this off the table for now.
Sure, once the array types are created automatically the command
becomes completely redundant.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Weslee Bilodeau | 2007-04-09 21:40:28 | Re: Partitioned tables constraint_exclusion |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-09 20:59:17 | Re: Effects of GUC settings on automatic replans |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-09 22:43:08 | Re: non-recursive WITH clause support |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-04-09 20:16:10 | Re: UTF8MatchText |