Re: dropping role w/dependent objects

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Ed L(dot)" <pgsql(at)bluepolka(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dropping role w/dependent objects
Date: 2007-04-04 23:37:07
Message-ID: 200704042337.l34Nb7H12248@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-patches

Ed L. wrote:
> On Wednesday April 4 2007 5:02 pm, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > I guess if the bug were fixed, it'd be a non-issue.
> >
> > Sure, please submit a patch. ?It should not be too difficult.
>
> Perhaps this could be added to the TODO list? I won't get to it
> anytime soon.

Yes. What should the TODO text be?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ed L. 2007-04-05 00:11:26 Re: dropping role w/dependent objects
Previous Message Sergey E. Koposov 2007-04-04 23:22:38 PG 8.2.3, FSM warning & VACUUM

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-04-04 23:39:54 autovacuum multiworkers, patch 5
Previous Message Ed L. 2007-04-04 23:08:28 Re: dropping role w/dependent objects