From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tim Perrett <hello(at)timperrett(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PGSQL with high number of database rows? |
Date: | 2007-04-03 09:04:42 |
Message-ID: | 20070403090442.GB8638@svr2.hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:28:28AM +0100, Tim Perrett wrote:
> Hey all
>
> I am possibly looking to use PSGSQL in a project I am working on for a very
> large client. The upshot of this is the throughput of data will be pretty
> massive, around 20,000 new rows in one of the tables per day. We also have to
> keep this data online for a set period so after 5 or 6 weeks it could have
> nearly a million rows.
>
> Are there any implications with possibly doing this? will PG handle it? Are
> there realworld systems using PG that have a massive amount of data in them?
This is in no way massive for pg. Many millions of rows is not a problem at
all, given that you have proper schema and indexing, and run on reasonable
hardware (hint: it might be a bit slow on your laptop). 20,000 rows / day
is still no more than about 14 / minute, which is a very light load for a
server grade machine to deal with without any problem at all.
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2007-04-03 09:10:26 | Re: PGSQL with high number of database rows? |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-04-03 08:36:14 | Re: Using C# to create stored procedures |