Re: PGSQL with high number of database rows?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tim Perrett <hello(at)timperrett(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PGSQL with high number of database rows?
Date: 2007-04-03 09:04:42
Message-ID: 20070403090442.GB8638@svr2.hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 09:28:28AM +0100, Tim Perrett wrote:
> Hey all
>
> I am possibly looking to use PSGSQL in a project I am working on for a very
> large client. The upshot of this is the throughput of data will be pretty
> massive, around 20,000 new rows in one of the tables per day. We also have to
> keep this data online for a set period so after 5 or 6 weeks it could have
> nearly a million rows.
>
> Are there any implications with possibly doing this? will PG handle it? Are
> there realworld systems using PG that have a massive amount of data in them?

This is in no way massive for pg. Many millions of rows is not a problem at
all, given that you have proper schema and indexing, and run on reasonable
hardware (hint: it might be a bit slow on your laptop). 20,000 rows / day
is still no more than about 14 / minute, which is a very light load for a
server grade machine to deal with without any problem at all.

//Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2007-04-03 09:10:26 Re: PGSQL with high number of database rows?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-04-03 08:36:14 Re: Using C# to create stored procedures