Re: Blocked post

Dave Page wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Dave Page wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >>>> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
> >>>> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
> >>>> not sure what the problem is?
> >>>>
> >>>> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
> >>>> Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
> >>> What an obvious ploy to get more time for development. ;-)
> >> In a bid to stave off such accusations, Simon had a couple of us witness
> >> the outgoing mail in his Sent Items folder. We can arrange for copies of
> >> our notarized statements to be provided if necessary :-p
> >
> > Well, FAST posted emails dated April 4 a few days ago, proving email
> > dates are not a valid method of authenticating the "sent" date. Perhaps
> > FAST's post-dated emails were meant to throw us off of Simon's pre-dating
> > them. ;-)
> >
>
> Darn, busted! After all that lobbying for a short release cycle we had
> to conspire with FAST to extend it again ;-)

Yep, I suspected a conspiracy from the start. ;-)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +